Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

µµÀç Àü¿ë¾×ÀÌ Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ ÄÚ¾î-µµÀç ºñ´Ï¾îÀÇ Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

Effect of modeling liquid on the shear-bond strength of zirconia core - porcelain veneer

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú±â°øÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 36±Ç 2È£ p.83 ~ 89
ÃÖº´È¯, ±èÀÓ¼±,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖº´È¯ ( Choi Byung-Hwan ) - ´ë±¸º¸°Ç´ëÇб³ Ä¡±â°ø°ú
±èÀÓ¼± ( Kim Im-Sun ) - ´ë±¸º¸°Ç´ëÇб³ Ä¡±â°ø°ú

Abstract


Purpose: This study is to evaluate the effect of modeling liquid on the shear-bond strength between zirconia core and veneering ceramic.

Methods: Disk-shaped (diameter: 12.0§® ; height: 3.0§®) zirconia were randomly divided into six groups according to the surface conditioning method and whether modeling liquid is used or not to be applied (N=60, n=10 per group): group 1 - control group with distilled water(ZD); group 2 - control group with modeling liquid(ZM); group 3 - airborne particle abrasion with 110-um Al2O3(AD)with distilled water; group 4 - airborne particle abrasion with 110- Al2O3 with modeling liquid(AM); group 5 - liner with distilled water(LD); group 6¡Ì¡Áliner with modeling liquid(LM). Contact angles were determined by the sessile drop method at room temperature using a contact angle measurement apparatus. The specimens were prepared using dentin veneering ceramics, veneered, 3 high and 2.8 in diameter, over the cores. The shear bond strength test was performed in a Shear bond test machine. Load was applied at a cross-head speed of 0.50§® /min until failure. The fractured zirconia surfaces were evaluated by using stereomicroscope ( x 30). Collected data were analyzed using SPSS(Statistical Package for Social Sciences) Win 12.0 statistics program.

Results: ZD showed the highest contact angle(50.6 ¡¾ 5.4 ) and LD showed the lowest value(6.7 ¡¾ 1.3 ). Control groups and zirconia liner groups were significantly higher contact angle than liner groups(p<0.05). LD was the highest shear bond strength(43.9 ¡¾ 3.8 ) and ZD was the lowest shear bond strength(24.8 ¡¾ 4.9 ). Shear bond strengths of control groups and contact angle of liner groups were not significantly different((p>0.05). Liner groups presented adhesive failures. The others groups showed cohesive and adhesive failures.

Conclusion: Modeling liquid groups showed lower contact angles and lower shear bond strength compared to those of distilled water groups.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI